Acquaintance
It all began with a random chat request — just a stranger saying hi. She was calm, witty, and somehow made sarcasm look elegant. What started as a 'unkwn?' turned into late-night jokes, courtroom puns, and unplanned debates about who's right (spoiler: always her). Sometimes, the best arguments don't end — they turn into friendships. 💫
Legally Bound — But by Friendship, Not Court Papers 💞
- 💭 Friendship is when a law student argues with you — and still wins your heart instead of the case.
- ⚖️ We don’t just vibe, we cross-examine each other’s minds.
- 😄 Mind syncing: when both start the same joke and end it with laughter in contempt of court.
- 🧠 She reads laws, I break them — balance of friendship restored.
Clients
Sandeep Chahal
Sandeep was once caught with a vintage 1911 handgun without authorization. Despite his obsession with guns, he now swears the best defense is Gursimran’s logic.
He learned one thing fast: Gursimran’s logic fires quicker than any bullet.
“She could talk me out of a fine faster than I could load a magazine,” he laughs.
Case Files ⚖️
Case No. 1 — The Healthy Habit Contempt 🥗 ⚒️
Charges: Defendant (Gursimran) accused of saying “haan kar lawangi” and never following Sandeep’s health advice.
Prosecution: “Milord, every promise starts with green tea and ends with chaat.”
Defense: “Objection! Happiness counts as calorie-free energy!” 😌
Observation: Despite ‘Doctor Chahal’s’ best efforts, accused continues her ‘diet defiance’ confidently.
Verdict: Guilty of melting the prosecution’s concern into affection. 💖
Sentence: 1 daily fruit + weekly smile report. Failure = Lifetime monitoring under clause “Tu Meri Zimmedari Aa.” 💙
Case No. 2 — Dil Di Hearing 💞 ⚒️
Title: Courtroom of Emotions — The People v. Sandeep and Gursimran 💞
Charges: Both accused of smiling too much during serious talks.
Observation: Judge catches them exchanging “secret signals” mid-hearing.
Verdict: Case dismissed — emotionally compromised courtroom.
Note: “Pyaar te logic ik court vich nahi chaldé, but ethe done chalde rehnde ne.” 💙
Case No. 3 — The Sleepy Justice 💤 ⚒️
Title: Randhawa v. Chahal — The Case of Midnight Chats and Morning Naps
Charges: Gursimran accused of complaining about being sleepy after staying up late chatting with Sandeep.
Prosecution: “Milord, she types ‘I'm sooo sleepy 🥱’ while still sending 10 more messages.”
Defense: “Objection! He's the one keeping me awake with laughter.” 😴
Observation: Every night ends with “Bas 5 minute hor,” every morning with “I need a nap.”
Verdict: Both guilty of emotional disturbance and laughter crimes.
Sentence: Duty: Sandeep to provide one cup of Green Tea per nap recovery. ☕💙
Case No. 4 — The Asheyaannn Effect 💙 ⚒️
Charges: Gursimran accused of saying “Asheyaannn” in a tone that left Sandeep speechless.
Prosecution: “Milord, that word caused logical system failure.”
Defense: “Objection! That's emotional damage, not evidence.” 😌
Observation: Sandeep caught smiling uncontrollably, attempting to hide it behind ‘professional silence’.
Verdict: Case adjourned indefinitely — court too overwhelmed.
Note: When she says “Asheyaannn,” logic resigns gracefully. 💞
Case No. 5 — The Shy Witness 😳 ⚒️
Title: Randhawa v. Chahal — The Case of Unspoken Words
Charges: Sandeep accused of repeatedly “freezing” mid-conversation — suspected of hiding words under shy smiles and half sentences.
Prosecution (Gursimran): “Milord, he’s clearly guilty of awkward pauses, lost thoughts, and overthinking his replies.” 😅
Defense (Sandeep): “Objection! I wasn’t nervous — I was... rehearsing my confidence!”
Observation: The court noted multiple moments of eye-contact evasion and that suspiciously soft smile whenever Gursimran teased him.
Verdict: Declared adorably shy and emotionally transparent ("if" she agree).
Sentence: Ordered to attend daily confidence sessions under Judge Randhawa’s supervision — sentence reduced for good heart and cute hesitation. 💙